I am informed that today is Blog Action Day, and that the topic this year is climate change.
For the record, I'm skeptical of the whole premise of the (non-)event. But, since 9000 other bloggers are holding forth, there's little harm in adding one more voice to the din.
Climate change is in large measure a problem of scalar mismatch : activities at the local scale of households and neighborhoods have spillover effects at much larger scales, which in turn change the configuration of opportunities and constraints at the local scale. With this come both problems of perception and problems of legitimacy.
Thursday, October 15, 2009
Thursday, October 8, 2009
As with the book of the same name, the heart of this blog is a framework intended to help people deliberate and make decisions within and about their built environment. Here's how I introduce the framework in the book (on p.72):
Individuals and groups trying to make decisions about their environment and how to live in it need a clear understanding of what is at stake. Some such decisions are especially difficult because there is quite a lot at stake on all sides: any given option preserves some values and destroys others, meets some obligations and violates others.
The framework [on page 73 of the book] is intended as a tool to help decision makers sort through the complexity of many important decisions regarding the built environment, to identify the values and obligations that may be at stake in a given situation. The framework is organized into four main parts, each of which is defined by an ethical question. The parts are further divided into more specific factors or issues that may play into a particular decision.